Monday, January 1, 2018

A Suggestion of a Program to Alleviate Poverty

Here is a document I prepared and sent in March 2014 to a Representative chairing a committee in the US House of Representatives. Of course, there was no response.

Eliminating Poverty in the US
A Suggestion[1]

Challenge:
If a rich nation like the US cannot solve the problem of chronic poverty, no nation on earth can solve it. Hence, the problem should be addressed here in the US. The rest of the world may then follow that model to address the poverty problem in their nations.

While talking about grand challenges, mission statements, and vision, President Kennedy is often quoted about the US Moon mission. A similar mission and vision is required to eliminate poverty in the US. Contrary to the usual practice of looking at poverty from the point of view of budgets and who pays what, it should be viewed and addressed from the point of how people invest their time from childhood through youth and during their professional careers.

Genesis of Poverty:
Every human being is endowed with 24 hours a day and they work around 40 hours a work week. Some have the education, knowledge, skills, abilities, jobs, and opportunities to earn millions of dollars working for those 40 hours while some others make nothing during those forty hours. Of course, there is nothing natural about the forty hour work week. This number is arrived at through negotiations and discussions over several generations. The nation has productive jobs with a demand for several billion person hours and people offering billions of person hours of their knowledge, skills, and abilities. The total number of hours of work of a particular type is shared by people capable of doing that work in some proportion with the result that some people actually work for 40 or more hours while others have work for less than forty hours. Owing to the nature of the work they perform, some people get very little for their hours of work. Yet others get no hours of work at all because their type and quality of contributions do not match the demand or they miss out on opportunities to get and keep a job. This is the genesis of poverty. No work leads to no income and ultimately to poverty. This equation is complicated by the introduction of machines, technology, and global trade into the workforce as machines also compete with people specifically for jobs requiring low grade skills and push such people into joblessness and poverty.

Poverty Alleviation Programs in the Government Budgets:
Governments try to address the poverty problem by collecting taxes from those earning and providing grants to the poor. The grant amounts given to the poor people are barely sufficient to satisfy their hunger while the tax payers feel such expenditures as a severe burden. First we should ask what moral rights do the poor have. The House report on War on Poverty (http://budget.house.gov/waronpoverty/) describes a large number of programs with significant investments. But a reading of the programs gives the impression that they are band-aids over band-aids without actually addressing the root cause of the problem.

Sharing Available Pool of Work:
In a democracy, national resources are owned by all people and all people have a responsibility to protect the nation and its resources. Going by this argument, the nation’s available work hours should be shared by all those seeking the opportunity to work. If there are more people willing to work than the hours of work available per person, people may bid to get work for more than their share of work hours. Winners pay and losers take money to forego their opportunity to work and earn money.
For the sake of this quick and simple analysis, let us assume that there is an average of 36 hours of work available for every person. Hence people who want to work for 40 hours per week would have to buy 4 hours out of someone else’s opportunity to work. One who gives up his opportunity to work for 36 hours gets only 32 hours of work as fulfillment of his opportunity and some cash for the other 4 hours. Let us assume that we pool such surrendered opportunity hours and compensated funds obtained in the buy-back process. We will discuss what we will do with these hours and funds in a latter paragraph.

National Service Responsibility of People:
It is also incumbent up on everyone to give a number of their hours to protect, preserve, and grow a democratic nation. As part of their responsibility, if we said that people should contribute 4 (out of 40 hour week) to the nation. The nation may use their time for national jobs. Instead of giving their time to the nation, some people may opt to buy their time back and work the full 40 hours and earn money. They may pay funds equivalent to the 4 hours of their time to the nation. This process adds more person hours and funds to the pool.

The Mission of Eliminating Poverty:
If we undertake the mission to eliminate poverty in the nation, one major program is to create productive work. This is really not a government work-at-nothing program. The pool buys time (person hours) from the unemployed at a certain hourly rate. In turn, the pool auctions the available hours to the private sector. By this method, the previously jobless people get paid work that is productive. With paid jobs, they move out of poverty. If properly priced and managed, the pool will be self-sufficient.
The most important point about this idea is not to keep doing this for ever. This program is not a new form of the current taxpayer funded poverty alleviation programs. We will explain that feature in the following paragraphs.

Categories of People:
There are generally five categories of people who are likely to fall into poverty by not actively participating in the productive economy.

1. Children
2. Unemployed with low grade skills
3. Old people
4. Chronically sick and disabled people
5. Those with attitude problems

The poverty of children can be addressed by getting them to devote their 40 hours at school gaining education, knowledge, and employable skills when they grow up. Such a scheme will eliminate the flow of people into poverty in the future. The Pool pays for the 40 or so hours given by children so that those financial resources support the children for food and schooling. In a couple of decades, the pool of children in poverty should decrease and become infinitesimally small.
Likewise, the poverty of unemployed people with low grade skills can be addressed by getting them to devote some hours to work they can do with their current low grade skills and some hours to upgrade their skills for better jobs in the near future. This creates a work force that is reasonably well educated, aptly skilled, and able and willing to work in the near future. The funding for the program comes from the Pool. Again, in over a decade, the number of unemployed should come down to zero thus eliminating the need for the continuation of the program. By locating the skill enablement centers in low cost areas of the country, costs as well as distractions can be minimized.

Old people who have not saved sufficient funds for their old age are the next category. The pool may pay them to work in jobs that are appropriate for old people especially in the auxiliary tasks related to educating children and training the currently unemployable workers.

Chronically sick and disabled people who have not provided for such circumstances become the nation’s responsibility. The issues with this group of people should be addressed by the general budget and by motivating future workers to save for their old age. This is really a matter of personal budgets, savings, and insurance to cover risks.

Finally, there may remain a small group of people that have an attitude problem that may persist in claiming their rights rather than taking advantage of the opportunities provided by this or any program. They are a burden and will become a nuisance if the nation does not persevere in getting them to rehabilitate. If they are not given an opportunity to become good and productive citizens, it is the fault of the nation and it has to pay for their condition. On the other hand, if these people do not take the opportunities given to them by the nation to gain skills and to work gainfully, it is their fault and they have no further rights than the charity of the good natured people.

Program Duration:
With the proposed method, the program does not go on forever. The poor are not supported forever. They are trained and moved into active and productive workforce. The indolent are given opportunities and failing which they are left to charities.

By ensuring that through monitoring the progress of children and youth, their upward economic mobility is guaranteed. Old people and sick people are also protected.

The program scales down as the national average productive work available reaches the national average worker hours available with due considerations for skill match.

As we mentioned earlier, technology and global trade can adversely affect the jobs of people with various types of stagnant skill sets. By tuning the program, people’s skills can be constantly monitored and improved and the possibility of people falling into poverty can be prevented.

Plan Based Payments:
Just as businesses are asked to submit a plan when they ask for investment or a loan, the recipients of funds in this program are asked to develop and submit a plan of how they expect to get out of poverty. The implementation of the plan is monitored and reported by the participants, their employer sponsors, and program managers.  The aim of the program and process is to create confidence in and commitment by the participants to get out of poverty for good. This planning process should inculcate in people, starting from their childhood that time is money. One has to invest time in activities that equip them with skills that get them good jobs and good pay. People have to prioritize their activities with purpose at every stage of their life. People have to develop a budget that takes into account what they can earn and the standard of living they can afford. People well above the poverty line have a good sense of priorities with respect to their investment of time as they choose activities. They also pay attention to budget their finances. On the other hand, the poor need a helping hand in these two aspects.

Conclusion and Recommendation:
It is time for the US to set up a national program to eliminate poverty in the foreseeable future. Congress is requested to consider the suggestion made here and launch a program in place of the hundreds of disconnected programs in the current budgets.



[1] By Som Karamchetty, PhD, somkdsr@verizon.net, March 2014

No comments:

Post a Comment